c. A firm will only have to apply the “
Subsequent Employment or Association With an
Attest Client” interpretation [1.279.020] of the “Independence Rule” if the former
employee, by virtue of his or her employment at an entity described under items c–l
of the definition of affiliate, is in a
key position with respect to the financial statement
attest client. Individuals in a position to influence the attest engagement and on the
attest engagement team who are considering employment with an affiliate of a
financial statement attest client will still need to report consideration of employment
to an appropriate person in the firm and remove themselves from the financial
statement
attest engagement, even if the position with the affiliate is not a key
position.
d. A covered member’s immediate family members and close relatives may be
employed in a key position at an entity described under items c–l of the definition of
affiliate during the period of the professional engagement or during the period
covered by the financial statements, provided they are not in a key position with
respect to the financial statement attest client.
e. A covered member who is an individual on the attest engagement team, an individual
in a position to influence the attest engagement, or the firm may have a lease that
does not meet the requirements of the “
Leases” interpretation [1.260.040] under the
“Independence Rule” with an entity described under items c–l of the definition of
affiliate during the period of the professional engagement. The covered member
should use the “Conceptual Framework for Independence” to evaluate whether any
threats created by the lease are at an acceptable level. If the covered member
concludes that threats are not at an acceptable level, the covered member should
apply
safeguards to eliminate the threats or reduce them to an acceptable level.
f. A member or member’s firm may enter into a staff augmentation arrangement with
entities described under items (c)–(l) of the definition of affiliate during the period of
the professional engagement or during the period covered by the financial
statements. The member should use the “Conceptual Framework for Independence
”
to evaluate whether any threats created by the staff augmentation arrangement are
at an acceptable level. If the member concludes that threats are not at an acceptable
level, the member should apply safeguards to eliminate the threats or reduce them to
an acceptable level. If safeguards are not available or cannot be applied to eliminate
or reduce the threats to an acceptable level, the member should not enter into the
staff augmentation arrangement
.03 A member must expend best efforts to obtain the information necessary to identify the
affiliates of a financial statement attest client. If, after expending best efforts, a member is
unable to obtain the information to determine which entities are affiliates of a financial
statement attest client,
threats would be at an acceptable level and independence would
not be impaired if the member (a) discusses the matter, including the potential impact on